Boats for SaleArticlesBoating ServicesBoating ToolsDestinationsDistributionAdvertising InfoAbout UsHome
 
MBIA Archives
  October 2008
  September 2008
  August 2008
  July 2008
  June 2008
  May 2008
  April 2008
  March 2008
  February 2008
  January 2008
  Nov/Dec 2007
  October 2007
  September 2007
  August 2007
  July 2007
  June 2007
  May 2007
  April 2007
  March 2007
  February 2007
  January 2007
  Nov/Dec. 2006
  October 2006
  September 2006
  August 2006
  July 2006
  June 2006
  May 2006
  April 2006

News from MBIA

Volume 16 No. 10 October 2008
The Power of One
 
By Van W. Snider, Jr., CAE
President, Michigan Boating Industries Association
I suspect some of you, who are boaters, are aware that Congress passed the Clean Boating Act of 2008 which was signed into law recently by President Bush.  S. 2766 and H.R. 5949 were legislative proposals introduced in response to a ruling in March of 2005 from the U.S. District Court located in the Northern District of California.  The ruling stated the EPA’s regulation, excluding discharges incidental to the normal operation of a vessel from NPDES permitting, exceeded the Agency’s authority under the Clean Water Act.  In short, the judge’s ruling required the EPA to implement a NPDES permit regulation for recreational boats.  Without spending the majority of this article explaining in more detail all of the aspects of this process, let it suffice to say this court decision was extremely unpopular among boaters, sailors, fishermen, and the boating industry.  As the EPA moved forward with implementation, what resulted was a strong, bipartisan Congressional effort, through consensus, to ensure the legislation, to continue the long history of an exemption from the permitting process for recreational boats, was passed on both the House and the Senate.

It is no easy task to pass legislation in Congress.  Our federal Representatives and Senators find themselves deadlocked on most issues.  I recently read that only 2% of the bills introduced in this Congress have been passed, 12,944 introduced with only 316 passing, and only 183 of those 316 were bills with significant substance.  The National Marine Manufacturers Association reported that there were 240 bills introduced in the Senate Environmental and Public Works Committee, which had to approve S. 2766, and only six passed out of this committee, S. 2766 being one of them.

There were a number of key legislators from the Midwest and their staffs that helped protect boaters from this excessive regulation.  Congresswoman Candice Miller (R-10) from Michigan, and Ohio Representatives Steven LaTourette (R-14) and Patrick Tiberi (R-12) played significant roles in helping move this legislation through Congress.  Details on the Clean Boating Act of 2008 can be found at www.congress.org for those who want to see which legislators supported the bills.

In the early 90’s, Congress implemented a luxury tax on high-end luxury cars, furs, jewelry, private aircraft and boats.  Adding a ten percent luxury tax had the intention of generating more tax revenue, but Congress finally realized that this tax impacted businesses and their employees; i.e., there was a negative impact on employment, particularly as it related to boat manufacturers and retail boat sales.  The primary reason that Congress repealed the luxury tax was the concerted and focused efforts by the marine industry to communicate how the luxury tax was negatively impacting jobs.

I mention both the luxury tax and the recent passage of the Clean Boating Act of 2008 for one reason: both of these legislative efforts show that all of us that are interested in continuing the viability of recreational boating, working together, can accomplish an objective when we work in unison and speak with one voice.  I call it “The Power of One” – working in partnership, a collaboration of different organizations, businesses, and individuals who have the same objective.

What was exciting and fulfilling to me about the passage of the Clean Boating Act of 2008 was the extensive involvement by various elements within the recreational boating environment.  It was the most significant, coordinated legislative effort I have seen to date for our industry, including members of yacht and boat clubs, fishing groups, marine trade associations, businesses, and individual boaters.  I congratulate all of you who communicated with your legislative Representatives and Senators and their staffs.  Kudos to the staffs of the National Marine Manufacturers Association, the Marine Retailers Association of America and BoatUS, as well as other national, regional and state trade and consumer associations that worked together on this important legislation.

As we approach the 2008 elections, and not being able to forecast with any certainty the outcomes, I feel more confident than ever that those of us who love boating and the boating lifestyle, will be able to express our opinions together to our newly elected legislative leaders by acting as one.  We have learned a valuable lesson.  If you want to stay informed, and get involved, go to our website, www.mbia.org and sign up to receive updates.